Quantcast

NYC Mayor Race 2013: Why Conservatives Just Secretly Won It

nyc, mayor, race, 2013:, why, conservatives, just, secretly, won, it,
NYC Mayor Race 2013: Why Conservatives Just Secretly Won It
Image Credit: AP

There may be hope in this election cycle for conservative New Yorkers after all. Although the NYC mayoral election seems out of reach, the conservatives are winning on the issue of campaign finance. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday ruled in favor of the conservative New York Progress and Protection PAC (NYPPP) and granted the group an injunction allowing them to accept donations larger than $150,000. This ruling reversed the October 17 decision by U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty in the Southern Manhattan District, barring the PAC from accepting donations exceeding $150,000.

The Court of Appeals did not rule in favor of or against the State of New York’s overall campaign finance laws. The injunction simply allowed the NYPPP to accept donations of more than $150,000 in the current NYC mayoral election campaign. The court did, however, hint that the NYPPP had made a strong case for reform of overall campaign laws, as stated by Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs: “The Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. FEC that the government has no anti-corruption interest in limiting independent expenditures…It follows that a donor to an independent expenditure committee such as NYPPP is even further removed from political candidates and may not be limited in his ability to contribute to such committees.”

This decision comes on the heels of a major Supreme Court case on campaign finance, McCutcheon v. FEC. Shaun McCutcheon, the CEO of an engineering firm in Alabama, argued in this case campaign finance laws that limit aggregate donations violate the First Amendment. The Republican National Committee agreed and together they sued the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The Roberts court has ruled against campaign finance laws before: In Randall v. Sorrell the court held Vermont’s campaign limits were too low and, most notably, in Citizens United v. FEC the court struck down the ban on corporate contributions. It seems the Supreme Court has three options: to broadly disavow campaign finance laws, to leave the laws as they are, or to outlaw aggregate limits. A decision to broadly remove campaign finance limits or to outlaw aggregate limits by the Supreme Court, combined with the momentum in NYC created by the ruling in favor of the NYPPP, would be a victory for conservatives in NYC and elsewhere. The Supreme Court will issue its ruling at the end of the autumn session.  

Like us on Facebook:
CLOSE | X

Do you agree that our
generation needs a voice?

Take a One-Question Survey and Give Us Your Feedback.
Take the survey now