Forget 'Westworld' — our brains are actually great at telling humans and robots apart

Forget 'Westworld' — our brains are actually great at telling humans and robots apart
Source: HBO
Source: HBO

No matter what HBO's epic robot-drama Westworld would have you believe, androids and humans aren't indistinguishable — yet. Our brains are actually quite adept at telling humans and robots apart, according to researchers at the University of California, Berkeley.

A new study published in the journal Nature Communications indicates it takes less than a second for our brains to figure out whether a person or thing is actually alive or not, in a process the researchers have termed "ensemble lifelikeness perception."

"This unique visual mechanism allows us to perceive what's really alive and what's simulated in just 250 milliseconds," Allison Yamanashi Leib, the study's lead author, said in a university news article published Monday.

A robot named Pepper on display in Tokyo
Source: 
Kazuhiro Nogi/Getty Images

The researchers showed 68 adults images of people and things, including "an ice cream sundae, a guinea pig wearing a shirt, a hockey player" and a "toy car carrying toy passengers," the article said. The participants then had to rate the images according to "lifelikeness." 

The results showed that, even when the participants in the study weren't able to discern or retain all the details of the images, they could judge almost immediately what was alive and what wasn't.

"Our study shows that participants made animacy decisions without conscious deliberation, and that they agreed on what was lifelike and what was not," said UC Berkeley's David Whitney, a senior author on the study. "It is surprising that, even without talking about it or deliberating about it together, we immediately share in our impressions of lifelikeness."

So for now, at least, it seems the possibility of being confused about whether something is a real-life person or a very lifelike robot remains a TV fantasy.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Anna Swartz

Anna is a staff writer for Mic covering breaking news. She can be reached at aswartz@mic.com.

MORE FROM

Scientists are pretty sure that deep inside the moon, there’s water

The explosive story of water on the moon.

The six words that will make you sound smarter than all your friends when watching the eclipse

What is an umbra? How does the Saros cycle work? The total solar eclipse, explained.

Do you have little freckles in your eyes? This might be why.

Remember to protect your eyes.

The US desperately needs computer science majors, so keep coding

There are more than 500,000 computing jobs open in the US right now.

The 2017 solar eclipse will help scientists figure out just how much energy we get from the sun

Reflections are tricky things — as we'll learn when August's total solar eclipse hits.

Scientists are pretty sure that deep inside the moon, there’s water

The explosive story of water on the moon.

The six words that will make you sound smarter than all your friends when watching the eclipse

What is an umbra? How does the Saros cycle work? The total solar eclipse, explained.

Do you have little freckles in your eyes? This might be why.

Remember to protect your eyes.

The US desperately needs computer science majors, so keep coding

There are more than 500,000 computing jobs open in the US right now.

The 2017 solar eclipse will help scientists figure out just how much energy we get from the sun

Reflections are tricky things — as we'll learn when August's total solar eclipse hits.