Initial Thoughts on Fiscal Cliff Deal Outline

Before we get too far ahead of ourselves, lets not forget that this still has to pass a cantekerous Congress, specifically a very grumpy collection of Republicans in the House. Theoretically, Boehner could pull enough Republicans if Pelosi can get most of the Democrats on board but that remains to be seen.


As for the initial outlines of the deal, a couple big things are immediately apparent.

1. It doesn't look like there are any real plans for deficit reduction in this deal. Spending cuts look like they're targetted at stimulus expansions on other breaks rather than any cuts in real spending.

2. Democrats got tax raises, Republicans didn't get any entitlement reform. Short term, that doesn't look good for Republicans but the devil may very well be in the details.

3. No mention of the sequester (supposedly a one-year delay is being discussed).

4. No mention of the debt ceiling, meaning the Republicans will most likely once again use it as a club to beat Obama over the head with over the course of the next few weeks.

 

As it stands, the House doesn't even plan to hold a vote on the bill today, meaning even if there is a deal, we won't know about the likelihood of passage until at least tomorrow. A filibuster in the Senate may delay it even longer. 

At the end of the day, when they pass it isn't terribly relevant so long as its in the next few days as any passage will be back-dated to 1/1/13.

And remember, the reports are still conflicting, so there may be no deal at all:


Now, let's see what the President has to say.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Mark Kogan

Mark is a lawyer and Mic contributor living in Washington, D.C.

MORE FROM

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.