Pakistan's Paranoia

This is the second article in a two-part series on Pakistan. The author attended a speech in Washington, D.C. given by former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf. In Part 1, she examined Musharraf's view on the U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

Last week, former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf told a crowd in Washington that his country had been a perpetual victim at the hands of the United States and India.

Calling India an “existential threat” to Pakistani security, Musharraf was self-pitying, arguing that Pakistan’s “strategy has always been one of […] deterrence” against Indian militarization. According to the former president, a self-described “man for peace and rapprochement,” Pakistan has reluctantly followed India’s lead in developing and testing nuclear bombs in the name of self-defense.  

Before we go any further, it is important to get a sense of the tempestuous relationship between India and Pakistan, and the Pakistani paranoia that largely prevents its improvement. Since Pakistan was carved out of India in 1947, the two have fought three wars leaving scores on both sides dead. The on-going dispute over Kashmir has seen hundreds of thousands killed and provided a training ground for some of the region’s most lethal militant groups.

Pakistan’s unhealthy obsession with India has given the army unrestricted power; the armed forces budget alone consumes 16 percent of the government’s budget, whereas education is allotted just 1.2 percent of spending.

It has also shaped Pakistan’s efforts in, and vision for, Afghanistan. Musharraf told his audience that he has evidence that “India is trying to create an anti-Pakistan Afghanistan” as U.S. forces prepare to disengage from the region. He might be reminded that it was Pakistan that helped create (and in many ways, promote) the Taliban in the 1990's in an effort to deter India’s allies in northern Afghanistan. India has spent over $1 billion in aid to Afghanistan, which has not only improved much-needed infrastructure, but also nurtured an increasingly friendly relationship between the two countries. Worse still for Pakistan, a number of ethnic groups in Afghanistan who are traditionally friendly with India (like the Tajiks) are in positions of power.

Musharraf warned in his talk that any efforts by India to influence events in Afghanistan “must not be allowed,” for poor Pakistan would have “to fend for itself.” Of course, Pakistan has shown how it fends for itself in the form of Lakshar-e-Taiba and Mumbai.

For a particularly thoughtful look at Pakistan’s Indian complex, Aatish Taseer’s recent piece in the Wall Street Journal is a must read. Taseer, the son of the slain Pakistani governor of Punjab, examines the hysteria behind his father’s hatred of India. Contrary to what Musharraf would tell you, Taseer says that as Pakistan has led the U.S. into thinking it is fighting the war on terror, the army has been playing a double game “in which some terror was fought and some […] actively supported.”

Musharraf did highlight the need to resolve the Kashmir dispute, which he claimed he nearly did while in office (a glimmer of truth), though he mentioned that no world leader ever lectures India on resolving the conflict, just poor Pakistan. No need to mention that the Pakistani army trained militants to fight in Kashmir in an effort to bring India to the negotiating table in the first place.

As to the widely-held belief that elements of Pakistan’s ISI are sympathetic to numerous militant groups with goals of attacking India, Musharraf said he “could not rule out” that possibility, but that he was sure the Pakistani army “will root them out” soon.

So is there hope yet for Pakistan? The answer lies, Musharraf said, in a “democratic political dispensation which breaks the political status quo. Therefore, all eyes are on the 2013 elections.” The short answer: Musharraf is the hope. To convince those (numerous) skeptics in the audience, the former president, with a hint of a smile, decided to quote the eminent Saddam Hussein.

“The next election is going to be the mother of all elections.”

Oh, brother. 

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Laura Hughes

After graduating from Denison University in 2008 with a B.A. in Middle East Studies, Hughes moved to Cairo, Egypt to work for a financial communications agency and to continue her research on the political evolution of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. During her subsequent two-year stay in Egypt, Hughes conducted media and security analysis for US Centcom. She is currently based in London, pursuing her M.A. in Intelligence and International Security in the War Studies department at King's College London. Apart from her interest in global security and terrorism, she's a Washington Capitals fanatic.

MORE FROM

NBC News chief wanted to dial back MSNBC's liberal identity. Then Trump got elected.

Some insiders say MSNBC is having an identity crisis — but the channel is having its best ratings year ever.

What is the Senate parliamentarian? Lately, she’s been Mitch McConnell’s nemesis.

And does the GOP have to follow her rulings?

Anthony Scaramucci acknowledges “colorful language” after ‘New Yorker’ published his wild rant

Scaramucci's "colorful language" revealed the high-stakes tension going on at the White House.

Lindsey Graham says he is creating legislation to block Trump from firing Mueller

Graham said earlier that ousting Mueller would mark the "beginning of the end of the Trump presidency."

Despite Trump, military leaders say there will be no changes to transgender policy for now

“In the meantime, we will continue to treat all of our personnel with respect."

NBC News chief wanted to dial back MSNBC's liberal identity. Then Trump got elected.

Some insiders say MSNBC is having an identity crisis — but the channel is having its best ratings year ever.

What is the Senate parliamentarian? Lately, she’s been Mitch McConnell’s nemesis.

And does the GOP have to follow her rulings?

Anthony Scaramucci acknowledges “colorful language” after ‘New Yorker’ published his wild rant

Scaramucci's "colorful language" revealed the high-stakes tension going on at the White House.

Lindsey Graham says he is creating legislation to block Trump from firing Mueller

Graham said earlier that ousting Mueller would mark the "beginning of the end of the Trump presidency."

Despite Trump, military leaders say there will be no changes to transgender policy for now

“In the meantime, we will continue to treat all of our personnel with respect."