Abortion Should be Legal Through Infancy, Medical Ethicists Argue

A recently published article by a team of medical ethicists at Oxford University argues for the right of parents to abort newborn babies because they are “morally irrelevant.”  They argue this on the basis of the premise that ending the lives of newborn babies is no different than abortion. While I personally do not disagree with their premise, the thought of legalizing infanticide is a moral aberration that reeks of grave evil.

The Journal of Medical Ethics published the article, which argues that babies are not “actual persons” and therefore should not be guaranteed the “moral right to live.” The academics strongly defend the notion that parents who are disappointed with having a disabled newborn should have the right to end the life of the infant so as to relieve themselves of the burden of raising it.

Since co-authoring the article, “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?” Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva have received numerous threats. Professor Julian Savulescu, who serves as editor of the journal, and is the director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics labeled those who made abusive and threatening posts in response to the study as “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society.”

In the article, Giubilini and Minerva argue, “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus  in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life of an individual.”  They further proceed to explain their view that newborns are not actual persons because, they say, “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a person in the sense of subject of a moral right to life. We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence (at least) basic such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her.” 

They use this argument to justify after-birth abortion on the basis that “it is not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense. “

The fundamental intent in writing the article was to emphasize that the killing of a newborn baby is really no different than that of aborting an unborn child.  While they argue that “after-birth abortion” should be allowed in all cases that apply to normal abortions, they strongly emphasize the benefits the procedure could have for those parents who had no prior knowledge that their child would be born with a disability.

Not only have the arguments of Giubulini and Minerva resulted in many hate messages in their email inboxes, but they have also warranted much concern from Dr. Trevor Stammers, who serves as the Director of  Medical Ethics at St. Mary’s University College. 

Stammers expresses strong concern about the possible implications, “If a mother does smother her child with a blanket, we say ‘it’s doesn’t matter, she can get another one.’ Is that what we want to happen?  What these  young colleagues are spelling out is what would be the inevitable end point of a road that ethical philosophers in the States and Australia have all been treading for a long time and there is certainly nothing new.”  

In reference to the term after-birth abortion, Stammers states, “This is just verbal manipulation that is not philosophy. I might refer to abortion henceforth as antenatal infanticide.” 

Fortunately, there is at least one medical ethicist with a brain functioning well enough to realize that  abortion in general is one grave evil that society should have never even considered in the first place. Unfortunately, as seen in the after-birth abortion argument, abortion has claimed the lives of 50 million unborn babies in America since 1973, and may soon include the right to add newborn babies to the ever-growing list of victims.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

John Begin

John Begin is a middle school teacher having spent three years teaching science and social studies. A 2001 graduate of the University of South Florida with a double major in Religious Studies and History, Begin is very passionate about aggressively attacking the social problems of today's world. Conservative on some issues, while Liberal on others Begin believes firmly that the best way to move the country forward is to find a middle ground apart from the politics of catering to lobbyists. Please comment on my posts. I value all contributions and am happy to mic comments.

MORE FROM

Women beer drinkers finally get the Beer for Her they never asked for

Why drink a rugged manly beer when you can have Aurosa's pink girly beer instead?!

Six months after the Women’s March on Washington, the Resistance Revival has a message for Trump

"Well I/ Went down to the White House and I/ Took back what they stole from me," the Resistance Revival Chorus sang in a Times Square flash mob last weekend.

20 attorneys general write letter urging Betsy DeVos to keep sexual assault protections

The attorneys general reminded DeVos that scrapping Title IX guidance will have a chilling effect on sexual assault and rape reporting rates.

New study suggests high workloads and aging doctor population means looming OB-GYN shortage

Obstetricians and gynecologists are overworked at nearing retirement age — without a younger contingent to replace them.

Why pro-life doctors want the First Amendment to protect their right to lie to patients

Crisis pregnancy centers believe they should be exempt from a law saying they should inform patients about all their medical options, including abortions.

‘Brown Girls’ wants to tell women of color’s stories in all their messy, complicated glory

Creators Fatimah Asghar and Sam Bailey want to let their characters break free of the neat identity categories people are wont to place them in.

Women beer drinkers finally get the Beer for Her they never asked for

Why drink a rugged manly beer when you can have Aurosa's pink girly beer instead?!

Six months after the Women’s March on Washington, the Resistance Revival has a message for Trump

"Well I/ Went down to the White House and I/ Took back what they stole from me," the Resistance Revival Chorus sang in a Times Square flash mob last weekend.

20 attorneys general write letter urging Betsy DeVos to keep sexual assault protections

The attorneys general reminded DeVos that scrapping Title IX guidance will have a chilling effect on sexual assault and rape reporting rates.

New study suggests high workloads and aging doctor population means looming OB-GYN shortage

Obstetricians and gynecologists are overworked at nearing retirement age — without a younger contingent to replace them.

Why pro-life doctors want the First Amendment to protect their right to lie to patients

Crisis pregnancy centers believe they should be exempt from a law saying they should inform patients about all their medical options, including abortions.

‘Brown Girls’ wants to tell women of color’s stories in all their messy, complicated glory

Creators Fatimah Asghar and Sam Bailey want to let their characters break free of the neat identity categories people are wont to place them in.