This College Wants to Censor Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” Speech — Here’s Why

Source: Getty Images
Source: Getty Images

A group of students at the University of Oregon in Eugene are calling for the removal of a line from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech currently painted on a wall in the school's Erb Memorial Union. 

It's a line you're probably familiar with, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

King's message, they said, no longer applies. The speech's singular focus on racial diversity and not, say, issues of gay rights or feminism makes it noninclusive.

"Diversity is so much more than race," Mia Ashley, a sophomore architecture major, told the Daily Emerald. "Obviously race still plays a big role. But there are people who identify differently in gender and all sorts of things like that." 

The quote replaced another quote by a former dean emeritus, William C. Jones, which read, "Established by an enlightened state for service and inspiration. Reverent before its heritage of principle and institution. Eager in its adventure with idea and deed. Guardian of the noble in man's aspiration for the humane society. Leader in the quest for the good life for all men."

Perhaps setting a precedent for the latest controversy, in 1987 the Jones passage too was ruled problematic and removed after students objected to its singular reference to men and not humankind.

Lately college students across the country have made news for taking similar stands.

In December students at Lebanon Valley College in Pennsylvania demanded that a hall named for former college president Clyde A. Lynch be renamed because of the inadvertent racial association of his surname. That same month students at Oberlin College in Ohio accused dining halls of culturally appropriation and insensitivity in its offerings. Students from school's the black student union said there was not enough multicultural food on campus, the New York Times reported.   

For now, King's words aren't going anywhere; the student union considered the request and decided against it. But the student union director, Laurie Woodward, told the Emerald that the outcome is less important than the renewed interest in this kind of debate. 

"What words are is important," Woodward said, "but what's more important is that people think about what the words should be."

Source: YouTube

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Jon Levine

Jon Levine is a staff writer at Mic, covering politics and people. He is based in New York and can be reached at JLevine@mic.com.

MORE FROM

Meet the Girl Scouts that will earn badges for being cybersecurity experts

They'll soon get badges for coding, cryptography and more.

How to use the Snapchat Map while everyone else continues to be confused about it

Everything you need to know about the new feature.

Planet 10? Scientists may have discovered a hidden planet in our solar system

There could be a ninth — or even 10th — planet hiding out in our solar system.

Scientists created a robot that will iron your clothes for you

Shut up and take my money.

Moth eyes have inspired the touchscreen of the future

It's going to change the anti-reflection game.

Twitter was flagging tweets including the word "queer" as potentially "offensive content"

Why Twitter put the word "queer" in the same category as violent, sexual imagery.

Meet the Girl Scouts that will earn badges for being cybersecurity experts

They'll soon get badges for coding, cryptography and more.

How to use the Snapchat Map while everyone else continues to be confused about it

Everything you need to know about the new feature.

Planet 10? Scientists may have discovered a hidden planet in our solar system

There could be a ninth — or even 10th — planet hiding out in our solar system.

Scientists created a robot that will iron your clothes for you

Shut up and take my money.

Moth eyes have inspired the touchscreen of the future

It's going to change the anti-reflection game.

Twitter was flagging tweets including the word "queer" as potentially "offensive content"

Why Twitter put the word "queer" in the same category as violent, sexual imagery.