Student Kicked Out of College Gym for Wearing "Inappropriate" Workout Attire (a Tank Top)

Source: Total Sorority Move

"Athleisure" might've just been added to the dictionary, but some universities aren't ready to embrace the Lululemon strappy tank top trend just yet. 

Such was the case for Danielle, a student at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia, who was kicked out of the school's fitness center for inappropriate attire.  

Was she wearing a see-through top? Pasties? This underboob bra? Nope. This is what she was wearing when the incident occurred: 

"Your shirt is cut too low in the back," a student employee told Danielle, as recounted in an interview with Total Sorority Move. "I'm going to have to ask you to leave." 

Confused because this is exactly what many girls are wearing in gyms (and to the mall... and to class... and to pretty much everywhere else) across the country? Danielle was a little thrown off as well. 

According to her, the private school's fitness center dress code states "all users must wear proper fitness attire." The following details are available on the university's website, as well as in an explanatory PDF

Source: Washington & Lee

The school does not allow "sleeveless shirts with the arm holes or gaps open below the bottom of the shoulder blades" or "shirts that expose parts of the abdominal area, rib cage, and/or the lower back, front or sides of the torso. (For the purposes of this policy the lower back is the area below a horizontal line under the shoulder blades.)" Because, rib cages are dangerous, after all. 

Danielle was not without a sense of humor about the ridiculousness of her ejection. In her (sarcastic) words, "the whopping four boys in the fitness center could safely enjoy their workouts without stumbling upon the erotica that was displayed in the form of a keyhole on my top."  

The school is defending their archaic protocol. The school's website states the dress code was put into place for the "health and safety of all users," to "[prevent] skin infections and to preserve the longterm life of the equipment." Two completely different ideas here.

Since conversation has started on social media, the school has posted a statement on its website from the Director of Athletics stating, "We want to assure the W&L community that the policy applies equally to men and women." Sure. Right.

We've got some questions here: Wasn't Danielle's tank designed specifically for the gym? Who is she even putting in danger by wearing a cut-out top? Herself? She's an adult, can't she take that risk on her own? Perhaps the fitness director just really, really hates Lululemon?

Read more: Teen Protesting School's Dress Code Forced by Her Principal to Get on Her Knees

They aren't the only school with a strict dress code. Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut, requires students to cover their shoulders. The school said the policy was put in place for safety reasons, similar to what Washington and Lee said, as there is a risk of MRSA and other staph infections. 

These aren't two isolated instances. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee also has a rule in place that states shirts must "fully [cover] the back, shoulders, chest, stomach and sides." While the school stated health concerns as one reason for the rule, it also cited this: "Muscle-bound men in cut-off shirts might deter freshmen from working out." 

(Ah yes, the old muscle-bound-men-in-cut-off-shirts-are-too-intimidating-to-work-out-near excuse.)

Want to ban tank tops for health reasons? Fine. But if these schools are using safety as an excuse to ban clothing to avoid "distraction," and/or discriminating against one sex, than this is a case of schools unnecessarily policing their students' wardrobes. 

Source: Giphy

h/t Total Sorority Move

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Hayley Wilbur

Hayley is a staff writer at Mic, covering style. Say hi: hayley@mic.com.

MORE FROM

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.