2016: Obama's America: A Guide to Why This Documentary is Relevant in Election 2012

This past week, I finally went with my sister-in-law to see the much discussed documentary 2016: Obama’s America. Initially, the movie had a limited release, but due to excellent response the film's release was expanded to over 1,000 theatres last weekend. The documentary is based on the book by Dinesh D’Souza and attempts to identify the motives behind Obama’s actions as president. This review is not an attempt to verify all the information and history presented in the film, but rather to give the reader an inside look (at least from my perspective) at this explosive and controversial documentary. 

The director’s primary explanation for why Obama governs as he does, is that Obama has a bias towards anti-colonialism. The following quote by Che Guevara, an Argentine Marxist Revolutionist, describes anti-colonialism this way:

“We must bear in mind that imperialism is a world system, the last stage of capitalism — and it must be defeated in a world confrontation. The strategic end of this struggle should be the destruction of imperialism. Our share, the responsibility of the exploited and underdeveloped of the world is to eliminate the foundations of imperialism: our oppressed nations, from where they extract capitals, raw materials, technicians and cheap labor, and to which they export new capitals — instruments of domination — arms and all kinds of articles; thus submerging us in an absolute dependance .... ”

Interpretation: Big countries took stuff from small countries (and got rich in the process) and
somebody should make them give it back.

So how would Obama have developed this mindset? The movie highlights a history of Obama’s interactions with known Communists, his late father’s avowed socialism, and his mother’s radicalism. During his early years, Obama surrounded himself with rather “unconventional” thinkers. (Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Rev.Jeremiah Wright, to name a few.) In college, Obama gravitated towards liberal professors and causes. D'Souza follows these various associations, again, attempting to identify how these individuals could have influenced his political ideology.

Much of the movie’s focus was what I would call psychoanalysis on Obama by D’Souza, trying to determine his motives for his behavior. Even if the director’s analysis of why Obama does what he does is incorrect, the facts are still valid as to what he is doing. He has reduced our nuclear arsenal and indicated to Putin that he would be more flexible after the election to continue with further reductions. He has increased our debt at a frightening pace. He has done virtually nothing to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and taken positions more favorable to Palestinian interests than Israel’s. He has blocked development of the Keystone Pipeline and off-shore drilling while approving drilling by Mexico in the same waters and funneling more money to Argentina to develop their own reserves.

For me, the most alarming element in the movie was warning about the U.S. debt. If your goal is redistribution of wealth, and not just between U.S. individuals but between rich and poor countries, how would you proceed since America still has tremendous resources? The answer: destroy the dollar. And this is exactly what has been happening. If you drive up the debt up to a point of inability to repay without resorting to printing new money, your currency becomes greatly devalued. The amount of additional currency printed by the Federal Reserve in the past four years has already contributed to the dollar’s decline. When you submit annual budgets with an excess of $1 trillion in deficits four years in a row, you are not serious about reducing the debt. Either Obama doesn’t see it as a threat, or he definitely sees it as a threat and is choosing to allow it to grow. Ultimately, the result is the same regardless of the intent. What matters is that we must stop the overspending now, not 30 years from now, or we will find ourselves in a different America than we know now.

The ultimate question D’Souza asks through this documentary is ”How in the world did we elect a man, 2 years out of the Senate, that we knew little to nothing about?” I have repeatedly asked myself this same question! D’Souza’s perspective is that because Americans wanted so desperately to move past our history of racism, there was an inherent desire for many around Obama to help him succeed. Many of those who voted for him had no idea who he was, what policies he believed in or where he had come from. But what better way to prove you aren’t racist than to vote for somebody of color?

The sub-title of the documentary states, “Love him, hate him, you don’t know him.” 

But we are getting to know him. We have seen his lack of leadership during the past four years and the dangerous direction he is taking our country. And for the sake of our future, in the words of Clint Eastwood, “It’s time to let him go.”


How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Elaine Hays

Hi, my name is Elaine Hays and I am a political, financial and economic junkie. I love reading and listening to the news, interpreting what I am hearing and then discussing it with those around me. Sometimes they agree with me and sometimes they don’t, but I thoroughly enjoy the dialogue. I am a CFP (Certified Financial Planner) and my husband, Tracy, is a CPA. We own a private wealth management firm that helps clients identify and then achieve their financial goals. We have co-authored two books, When God We Trust and Avoiding the Top Ten Money Mistakes. We have been married for 27 years and have four fantastic children – Taylor, Rachel, Ryan and Caleb. (And now a wonderful son-in-law, Joshua!) As a conservative, Christian woman, my world-view has a biblical perspective. I rely on scriptural truths to define my ideas of life, family and the role of government and you will see that expressed in my writing. I’m passionate about learning and began my post-high school education with a BBA in Marketing from Texas Christian University. At the age of 40 I returned to school and earned a Master of Science in Finance/Economics from West Texas A&M. At the age of 50, I began working on and completed 51 doctoral hours in Economics from Texas Tech University. My husband is a bit nervous to see what happens when I turn 60. We elect politicians who set policies that govern our economy. We make choices to spend, save or share money with others. All of these decisions have consequences, positive and negative, and our goal is to avoid the negatives. By pursuing knowlege on personal finances, economic principles and the impact of government policy on our daily lives, we become equipped to make better decisions. And the more we educate ourselves, the more we have to pass on to your children and grandchildren – literally.

MORE FROM

Kshama Sawant on why Seattle needs an independent investigation into the Charleena Lyles shooting

Seattle City Councilperson Kshama Sawant, member of Socialist Alternative party, discusses the Charleena Lyles investigation, tenant voter registration, why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 and more.

The EPA seeks to undo clean water rule, putting 117 million Americans' water at risk

The new rule could have "long-reaching consequences for everyone living in the United States.”

This small Ohio town might stop treating heroin overdoses to save the city money

"People will die. It's plain and simple."

Here's what New York's first official LGBTQ monument will look like

Here's our first look at New York's new monument to LGBT communities.

How will Trump's travel ban be enforced? Here's what the Supreme Court's decision really means.

The Supreme Court's order prevents most of the ban from taking effect before the case is heard, with limited exceptions.

Tick saliva could be the key to fighting a dangerous heart condition

Ticks could hold the secret to treating this heart condition.

Kshama Sawant on why Seattle needs an independent investigation into the Charleena Lyles shooting

Seattle City Councilperson Kshama Sawant, member of Socialist Alternative party, discusses the Charleena Lyles investigation, tenant voter registration, why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 and more.

The EPA seeks to undo clean water rule, putting 117 million Americans' water at risk

The new rule could have "long-reaching consequences for everyone living in the United States.”

This small Ohio town might stop treating heroin overdoses to save the city money

"People will die. It's plain and simple."

Here's what New York's first official LGBTQ monument will look like

Here's our first look at New York's new monument to LGBT communities.

How will Trump's travel ban be enforced? Here's what the Supreme Court's decision really means.

The Supreme Court's order prevents most of the ban from taking effect before the case is heard, with limited exceptions.

Tick saliva could be the key to fighting a dangerous heart condition

Ticks could hold the secret to treating this heart condition.