Donald Trump drafts plan to pull out of NAFTA, then immediately says he won't — yet

Source: Getty Images
Source: Getty Images

President Donald Trump reportedly drafted a plan to pull the U.S. out of the North American Free Trade Agreement, a move that would set the stage for the his administration to fulfill his campaign promise to renegotiate the deal but could have wide-ranging economic effects.

But less than 24 hours later, according to a White House statement, the president had reassured both Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in a "pleasant and productive" conversation he "had agreed not to terminate NAFTA at this time."

According to the New York Times, a "senior administration official" said an executive order to withdraw from NAFTA was forthcoming, though its ultimate substance never materialized. Any withdrawal would trigger the six-month notification period set forth in the deal, during which Trump could potentially renegotiate the trade deal with fellow NAFTA signatories Canada and Mexico.

The plan was first reported by Politico, which cited two White House officials as saying the order could be handed down as early as this or next week. Politico noted National Trade Council head Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon, the former head of far-right site Breitbart News turned Trump's chief strategist, were key backers of the initiative.

NAFTA was originally signed by President Bill Clinton, along with Mexico and Canada. The deal eliminated trade barriers like tariffs, adjusted intellectual property law for compatibility between all parties and committed the signatories to investments in transportation infrastructure.

Wait, doesn't Trump hate NAFTA?

Trump's "pleasant and productive" conversation with the two leaders is a sharp contradiction with his campaign, when he labeled NAFTA the "worst trade deal ever," repeatedly railed against the U.S.' $50 billion annual trade deficit and said the agreement contributed to the massive losses of manufacturing jobs across the country in recent decades.

According to the Council on Foreign Relations, many economists have a different assessment: That signatories to the agreement have generally benefited. CFR argues NAFTA was one of the factors contributing to a tripling of North American regional trade from $290 billion in 1993 to more than $1.1 trillion by 2016.

While the progressive Economic Policy Institute estimates the resulting U.S. trade deficit with Mexico had displaced more than 680,000 U.S. jobs by 2010 and has contributed to lower incomes among U.S. manufacturing workers, other economists counter it lowered the prices of goods and created jobs in different sectors.

So why the rapid about-face?

The political backlash from today's trial balloon is the most immediately obvious explanation for why the White House backed down so quickly. But Trump is generally agreed to have the power to withdraw from NAFTA without congressional approval. Earlier in his presidency, he withdrew the U.S. from negotiations to form the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a larger international deal which was widely reviled by conservative populists as well as progressives who criticized the deal as a corporate handout.

As Politico noted, Trump's threat to unilaterally pull out of NAFTA alarmed members of Congress in both parties, particularly those from southwestern states who have industries highly reliant on U.S.-Mexico trade. Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain said the withdrawal would have "the worst possible impact" on his state. He added "I'd be glad to have renegotiation of some of the terms of it, because a lot of time has passed," but that a withdrawal would be "disgraceful and a disaster."

It's not the first time Trump has rapidly shifted his approach to an issue in the face of difficult political winds. Earlier this week, he abandoned fighting for funding for his promised wall on the border with Mexico when it became clear the unpopular idea could force a government shutdown, with officials saying he would return to the idea later.

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Tom McKay

Tom is a staff writer at Mic, covering national politics, media, policing and the war on drugs. He is based in New York and can be reached at tmckay@mic.com.

MORE FROM

Donald Trump is now blaming Obama for Russian election interference

Trump tweeted Obama "choked" on Russia, adding he thinks Obama was trying to protect Hillary Clinton.

Former Obama defense official: Russia hacks are "political equivalent of 9/11"

"I don't see much evidence of a response," Vickers added.

Groups spending millions to defeat Senate health care bill: "We win or lose over the next week"

"We've been hearing Republicans talk about repeal for seven years. It comes down to these next seven days."

CNN sent a sketch artist to Sean Spicer's off-camera press briefing

The sketch artist normally covers scenes from the Supreme Court.

The Trump administration just pulled funding from a group that fights white extremism

Right wing violence is heating up, and the Justice Department is looking the other way.

A new multimillion-dollar drive aims to get progressive young people to the polls in 2018

The new NextGen Rising campaign will sink money and people into boosting youth turnout.

Donald Trump is now blaming Obama for Russian election interference

Trump tweeted Obama "choked" on Russia, adding he thinks Obama was trying to protect Hillary Clinton.

Former Obama defense official: Russia hacks are "political equivalent of 9/11"

"I don't see much evidence of a response," Vickers added.

Groups spending millions to defeat Senate health care bill: "We win or lose over the next week"

"We've been hearing Republicans talk about repeal for seven years. It comes down to these next seven days."

CNN sent a sketch artist to Sean Spicer's off-camera press briefing

The sketch artist normally covers scenes from the Supreme Court.

The Trump administration just pulled funding from a group that fights white extremism

Right wing violence is heating up, and the Justice Department is looking the other way.

A new multimillion-dollar drive aims to get progressive young people to the polls in 2018

The new NextGen Rising campaign will sink money and people into boosting youth turnout.