California Proposition 37 Polls: GMO Prop is Not Science, It is Marking

The science of gene modification scares most people. In conjures up images of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. 

Those fears and a few million dollars have conjured up a voter initiative on California’s November ballot that we, affectionately, refer to as Proposition 37. 

But forget about Dr. Jekyll and his alter ego, the object of this initiative is not human gene modification. It’s not even about beef or lamb or chicken or the greatly increased breast size of the Butterball Turkey that will soon grace your Thanksgiving Table!   

Nope, the object of this proposal is food crop seeds that have been genetically modified to improve crop yields, resist disease, automate harvesting and extend “shelf-life.” These are all techniques that directly benefit consumers with lower prices and less spoilage and waste.

The USDA and the FDA routinely test products derived from genetically modified seed products and have NO EVIDENCE that any of these foods are less nutritious or in any way unsafe for human consumption; and Proposition 37 acknowledges this fact. It does not ban genetically engineered seed products. No, it only establishes an expensive new labeling requirement and enforcement bureaucracy that will make California farmers less competitive in the global market place.

A quick peek at the folks who are supporting and those who are opposing Proposition 37 brings into sharp relief the real motives of the authors and financial backers of Proposition 37.  It is, unsurprisingly enough, about money. 

The organic farming industry has invested about $6 million in support of the proposition. Think of it as a somewhat misleading marketing campaign. Allied with the organic farmers is the California Nurses Association. Can you say SEIU? Yes the union that represents the majority of California state workers.   

Arrayed against the proposition are California’s agricultural leadership, doctors, and every major news paper in the state! 

The latest polling finds 44% of respondents favoring the proposition and 13% undecided.  Since 50% of California voters have already voted, the high percentage of undecided voters probably dooms the proposition.  But just in case you are not convinced, a no-vote is estimated to save every California family $400/yr.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Joyce Cordi

Joyce Stoer Cordi is the publisher of Reimage America (www.reimagineamerica.org), a blog/podcast that focuses on the Business of Government based her on 30 years experience in enterprise transformation. Its all about strategy, planning and execution. She has touched almost every major business segment in the 21st century economy and worked with a variety of clients ranging from mature, multi-national Fortune 50/500/1000 companies to embryonic start-ups -- improving their bottom-lines by +/- $1B. She has been active in civic affairs, non-partisan and partisan politics since childhood. Joyce walked her first precinct as a Youth for Kennedy, while still in high school. She was a candidate for Congress from California’s 15th Congressional District in 2008. Her campaign urged voters TO FIRE CONGRESS, and, then, elect more business people and fewer lawyers to US Congress and the California State Legislature. A native Californian, Joyce is a long-time proponent of environmental protections – believing that it is not inconsistent for business to be ethical, responsible, and profitable – simultaneously. To learn more about The Business of Government and Joyce's approach to making government smarter, quicker, cheaper and smaller; visit www.reimagineamerica.org

MORE FROM

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.