2016 Election: How the GOP Will Reshape Itself Next Time Around

A shift in the GOP has started, and it is only furthered by the results of this election. The next generation of Republicans slowly, but surely, is influencing the party's platform, messaging, and structure. Others have already predicted a change in the GOP’s structure, specifically the way it operates/communicates. Alongside this adaptation will come an adaptation of its platform. These changes may not come within the next election cycle, or even the one after that, but they are coming.

I am not advocating for or against any of these changes or stances. These are not my personal views or stances, just my projections for where the party’s platform is headed.

Abortion: The GOP will hold its pro-life stance, but will officially include exceptions in the case of rape, incest, or endangerment of the mother's life.

Gay Rights: The GOP will reframe how it presents and views this issue. They will say that civil unions, and appropriate benefits, are the right of the government, and should not be denied to any partnership. Marriage, however, is left up to the church to decide. Due to the separation of church and state,the state cannot infringe upon the church’s right to decide.

Marijuana: The GOP will abstain from taking a stance on this issue, and will not include it in its official platform.

Government spending: No surprise here. The GOP will obviously continue to advocate for limited government, and limited government spending.

Taxation: Again, I believe the GOP will maintain its current stance on taxes. I do, however, think they will iron out one issue that has yet remained grey. They will support the simplification of the tax code and closing loopholes, however defined. Republican Senator Tom Coburn and famed anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist often butt heads on whether this would go against the GOP mantra of not raising taxes; I tend to believe the party will shift over to siding with Senator Coburn on this issue, despite currently being bound by Norquist’s pledge, which prevents this shift.

Military: The GOP will maintain a very pro-military stance.

Some may say the new GOP platform also needs to focus more on engaging and garnering support from women, youth, and other minorities. I do not believe that low support was due to a lack of targeting or focus, but rather a lack of identification. These groups felt alienated by the party more so because of the views than because of its focus (although both parties could do a better job of giving youth, and other groups, a seat at the table). By changing its stances on the issues I think it will automatically better target these minority groups,and gain a higher proportion of support within them.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Joe Belsterling

Not really sure "what" I am yet, but I'm certainly trying it all out. Currently, I am launching a startup of my own and serve as an advisor to a financial services startup, specifically dealing with their business strategy, legal issues, and investor/advisor/customer solicitation. I just wrapped up serving as interim FInance Director for a Congressional Campaign and co-founder of a hackathon, TribeHacks.com. Past experiences include working for a financial technology startup and working for several political startups/organizations/non-profits. I love anything to do with nature and closely follow Pittsburgh sports, NCAA Basketball, NCAA Lacrosse, and the Stock Market.

MORE FROM

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.