Immigration Reform 2013: Gang Of 8 Plan Will Be Self-Sabotaging

After years in political stalemate, immigration policy reform has once again come to the forefront of debate. This year holds the promise of a solution to the decades-old scrap over the free movement of people into and out of the U.S.

Sparked by the landslide victory of President Obama and carried on by the bipartisan effort of the so-called “Gang of Eight,” this seemingly unstoppable flood of support for immigration liberalization has yet to wane.

The proposal set forth by this “Gang” of four Republicans and four Democrats could represent an actual political desire to see real solutions set on the table — meaning that 2013 could hold the biggest victory of the Obama administration to date!

But before we get too wound up, let’s take a closer look at this so-called resolution to our immigration problem and the failed reforms of the past. The promises of Obama’s campaign and the proposal by the “Gang of Eight” hope to provide a “path to citizenship” for those here illegally, strengthen our borders, increase enforcement of immigration laws, and accept more high-skilled laborers into the U.S. workforce. Unfortunately, though, these plans still don’t cope with the long-term, systemic issue we face with future undocumented workers entering this country.

Without broadening our guest worker program and a legal pathway for future workers to enter the U.S., this plan will doom us to repeat this fight again. Although some form of legalization for the estimated 11 million undocumented workers now in the U.S. would be a good step, if we don’t expand opportunities for legal immigration for future waves of low-skilled workers, many immigrants will still have to break the law to come here for work.

Let’s not forget that President Reagan granted legal status to 3 million undocumented immigrants in 1986, but despite his desire, failed to provide a viable pathway for future laborers to come. Same fight, different time.

Despite the fact that guest worker programs, like the Bracero Program, have worked well before in this country, it’s pure politics rather than actual policy that will doom this effort from the start.

Surprisingly, the biggest opposition to this idea hasn’t come from the conservative right but actually from labor unions and Democratic politicians. Which makes sense: Labor unions dating back over a century have always discouraged the entry of new workers that would compete with their monopoly hold over labor contracts in certain industries. More recently, the AFL-CIO, the Teamsters, and then Senator Obama joined together in opposition of President George W. Bush’s attempt in 2007 to expand the guest-worker program.

It’s tragically ironic that after riding the wave of Latino voters to victory, that it would be politically disadvantageous for Democrats to systemically change immigration policy. But politicians don’t keep their jobs by upsetting their biggest constituencies. And labor unions are the big guns for the left just as anti-immigration conservatives are still a small but loud voice for the right.

We are still presented with an opportunity for great change this year. But I worry that our elected officials will fall into the same mistakes of the past and tailor policy so that it won’t hurt their political crony. 

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Roger Pattison

Roger Pattison is currently pursuing a Master's degree in economics from George Mason University and working in non-profit fundraising for a liberty-advancing organization. I write on topics related to science, trade, immigration, emergent order, and informal institutions. All opinions written are my own and do not represent the views of my employer or George Mason University.

MORE FROM

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.

The first out trans soldier has a message for Donald Trump

Retired Sgt. Shane Ortega served as a helicopter crew chief in the Army's 25th Division.

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.

The first out trans soldier has a message for Donald Trump

Retired Sgt. Shane Ortega served as a helicopter crew chief in the Army's 25th Division.