Failure to Improve Chinese-U.S. Relations Would Be a Massive Mistake

Among the many recent headlines involving Chinese piracy and trade distortion, it would be easy to characterize China as a nemesis. The media, elite academia, and local politicians have continuously distorted China’s image as an us vs. them mentality. However, if one were to logically analyze the relationship between the United States and China, he would realize the potential benefits of a close partnership: capable of both stabilizing the Middle East and promoting the global economy through transparent regulations and open markets.

In the midst of a recent cybersecurity firm’s report of Chinese hacking, U.S-Chinese relations have been questioned by both politicians and the public. Even among university courses, it is not uncommon for many students to associate China with labels such as currency manipulator, trade thief, and cyber-hacker. While these characterizations have been introduced for a variety of reasons, they tend to obscure the obvious benefits of a U.S. Chinese partnership.

As the U.S. finishes the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for an Asian-focused foreign policy, China’s substitute role in the Middle East will become more prominent than ever. Chinese dependence on Middle Eastern oil directly relies on the stability of the region. More than 50% of China’s imported oil comes from the Middle East, versus 20% of the United States. The U.S. transition out of the region puts a greater premium on the Chinese energy interest. Events such as the Arab Spring and civil or secular wars will pose major threats, without a strong U.S. presence, to the trade flows to China.

Another foreign policy motive for keeping strong ties with the Chinese is its intention of keeping Iran nuclear-free. An Iran possessing nuclear weapons would endanger the Persian Gulf and compromise the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Iran’s acquisition would further promote nuclear buildup, possibly leading to the Japanese acquisition of nuclear weapons. The relationship between China and the United States promotes regional stability and the prevention of nuclear buildup.

In terms of economic benefits, the Chinese relationship with the United States poses tremendous value. Last year, China surpassed the United States as the world’s largest trader measured in terms of the sum of export and import value: $3.87 trillion to $3.82 trillion. This is an amazing national feat considering the United States’ economy is double the size of the Chinese economy. However, political rhetoric has smeared this unprecedented landmark. In his 2011 article "Myths vs. Reality," GMU economics professor Walter Williams states that "We Americans are allowing ourselves to be suckered into believing that China is the source of our unemployment problems... " when in reality, "88.5 percent of U.S. consumer spending is on items made in the United States such as medical care, housing transportation," etc.

Another area of concern for many people is the balance of trade, or the comparison of imports and exports, which many claim to be the scoreboard of our economy. When we have a trade deficit, such as the present, we are supposedly "losing" jobs and our global share of the economy to countries like China. However, the fact that many lose sight of is our increasing value-added contributions to many sectors of the global economy. For example, the cost of an iPod ranges from $150-200, yet only $5 of value comes from China. Although many low-skilled and intermediate goods may be produced overseas at a higher volume, the United States still possess a premium on high-value specialization and innovation.

At the end of the day, friend or foe, the United States should take Sun Tzu’s quote to heart regarding Chinese relations: keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.

China’s rise as a superpower, and its potential relationship with the U.S. will highly influence the stability of the Middle East and the global economy within the foreseeable future. Thus, it is important that America get on the right side of history and seek to build a mutually beneficial relationship with the Chinese.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Kyle Gibson

Kyle Gibson is a graduate of the University of Virginia with Bachelors of Arts in Economics and Foreign Affairs. Born and raised in Alexandria, VA he has recently moved to Clifton where he helps operate a small business boutique. Kyle works within the African Affairs department of an international non-profit in D.C. focusing on improving the lives of millions through free enterprise, economic development, and job creation. Through research, and discussion, Kyle hopes to demonstrate the truths within personal liberty and freedom of thought. Kyle is a current graduate student of George Mason's School of Public Policy.

MORE FROM

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.