Independents React Favorably to President Obama's State of the Union Address

As party politics have grown increasingly divided, more and more people are identifying themselves as independents. Thus, any candidate must win over the majority of independent voters in order to ensure victory in November. President Obama's State of the Union Address officially kicked his campaign into high gear, and independent voters seem to reacted positively to his message. A CNN poll shows that 84 percent of the people polled had a positive reaction to the speech. Of those 84 percent, a majority of 42 percent were independent voters. Three major reasons stand out as to why President Obama's message resonated with independents:

1. Bipartisanship

The president emphasized a move toward compromise between the two parties. However practical or impractical this may be is irrelevant, for at this point, support of the speech shows a reaction to what has been said, not necessarily done. One of the reasons why we have witnessed a rise in independent voters is because of party divide. The more extreme each party gets, the more voters they lose, so President Obama's "reaching across the aisle" is music to independent voters' ears as they have grown jaded and distrustful of any hard-lined and uncompromising stance.

2. Jobs

The most pressing issue in America today is jobs. People are out of work and need help. The two parties have been seen as "playing politics" rather than getting things done to put Americans back to work. In fact, the president even bemoaned the detached nature of a Congress that can legally broker inside trading deals while many Americans worry where their next paycheck will come from. Again, this sort of rhetoric excites independent voters, who understand money's corrupting influence in both parties and wish to see more money in the hands of everyday working Americans, rather than in the hands of an increasingly rarified and wealthy Congress that does not work for the people.

3. Reference to the Military

The President's opening and closing with his analogy of bipartisan cooperation to the military was rhetorically brilliant. This one receives points in two ways: It exalts our military and their great accomplishments, and it gives an apt analogy of what bipartisan agreement can do for our country: accomplish a common goal. Independents, as well as most Americans for that matter, support our military and recognize their courage and heroism. For the president to honor them in his speech proves an ad populum approach that garners respect and admiration from the most extreme Democrat to the staunchest Republican, let alone independents who lean one way or the other. The move to bring the speech full circle, book ending it with his reference and analogy to the military, is a move to begin and end on the high note of what can be done if we work together, again emphasizing the bipartisanship that proves so effective for independents' approval.

Will this next year play out with Democrats and Republicans playing nice and reaching compromise to get things done in Washington? Probably not. But President Obama's address will certainly be on the minds of independent voters who hope so.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Danny Keener

My name is Danny Keener, and I am an English teacher at Santa Ana College and Chaffey College. My students ask me all the time if I am a conservative or a liberal. My answer is always the same: I don't think of myself as a conservative; I don't think of myself as a liberal; I simply think of myself as thinking for myself. And I ask them to do the same.

MORE FROM

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.