The Real Reason Not to Support the Muslim Brotherhood: They Support Egypt's Military Rulers

Egypt is celebrating the one-year anniversary of its revolution that resulted in the ouster of former president Hosni Mubarak. One of the most impactful results of this has been a new Egyptian government dominated by Islamists, lead by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Many Middle East pundits have warned of the grave threats the Brotherhood poses to U.S. foreign policy and its relations with Egypt, however, based on its previous behavior, it is more likely that the MB will simply comply with the leadership status quo in an effort to consolidate its power.

Domestically, the MB has been getting disturbingly close to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). Over the summer and through the fall, the SCAF and the MB clashed over a number of policy issues, including violence at protests and “supra-constitutional” principles that could have limited the MB’s ability to apply Islamic Shariah in the constitution. Lately however, the MB’s rhetoric has softened considerably regarding the military council, most prominently manifested in their agreement that the new constitution must be written before presidential elections take place. The fundamental Salafi Al Nour Party (who many Western pundits in their analyses frequently lump together with the MB into one group of “Islamists”), along with almost every other major political group, opposes this plan and demands that the SCAF step down as soon as possible to be replaced by a civilian president. At one point, the Brotherhood held the same views. However, in what can be regarded as a blatant move to ally itself with the current power holders, the MB is happy to keep the SCAF in charge, while overseeing and applying undue influence on the drafting of a new constitution.

The main reason many U.S. government officials are wary of a Brotherhood takeover of the Egyptian government, however, is related to U.S.-Egyptian and Israeli-Egyptian relations. While it is still in principle opposed to Israel, the MB has softened rhetoric regarding the Jewish state, and plans to keep the Camp David Accords intact. It has also had a number of meetings with high-level U.S. officials regarding foreign policy. The U.S. government will consider these developments as positive, although they show a worrying tendency of the MB to sacrifice both its principles and the will of its constituents in favor of the influence of those in power. Almost every other party in the Egyptian parliament supports less friendly relations with both countries, who were complicit in supporting decades of oppressive dictatorship that has yet to come to an end.

The Muslim Brotherhood is at its core a pragmatic organization. It has been so since its inception and subsequent banning in the 50s, when it had to work mostly underground. Now that it is able to act in the open, it will do everything in its power to keep its influential position in Egyptian politics and society. Just like the past (and current) dictators of Egypt, the MB will continue along the path of appeasement to the U.S. and others in power at the expense of the Egyptian people.  This, and not any other nebulous fear mongering regarding its Islamism or potential foreign policy, is why the Brotherhood should not be supported.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Karl Lindemann

After graduating from Tufts University, Karl spent a year in Syria studying Arabic. He slipped out just before the entire country exploded in uprisings against the oppressive Assad regime, and he currently resides in Washington, DC, where he is focused on Middle East policy and international development.

MORE FROM

Department of Homeland Security announces new airline security rules

The new measures could help end the electronics ban.

Democrats on Neil Gorsuch's first Supreme Court term: "We've got another Scalia"

Some say Gorsuch's even-handed performance during his confirmation hearings "might be more an act than it was a real persona."

Fox News just hired US Rep. Jason Chaffetz as a correspondent

Chaffetz is headed to Fox.

Here are the key rulings from the Supreme Court's busy June term

The court's term ended with rulings on immigration, the First Amendment, LGBTQ rights and more.

These 3 Republican governors could pose the biggest threat to the Senate health care bill

Why some Republican governors oppose their own party's health care bill

When it comes to upholding the Paris climate agreement, America's mayors are leading the way

In spite of an uncooperative U.S. government, mayors around the world are working together to set the agenda on climate change.

Department of Homeland Security announces new airline security rules

The new measures could help end the electronics ban.

Democrats on Neil Gorsuch's first Supreme Court term: "We've got another Scalia"

Some say Gorsuch's even-handed performance during his confirmation hearings "might be more an act than it was a real persona."

Fox News just hired US Rep. Jason Chaffetz as a correspondent

Chaffetz is headed to Fox.

Here are the key rulings from the Supreme Court's busy June term

The court's term ended with rulings on immigration, the First Amendment, LGBTQ rights and more.

These 3 Republican governors could pose the biggest threat to the Senate health care bill

Why some Republican governors oppose their own party's health care bill

When it comes to upholding the Paris climate agreement, America's mayors are leading the way

In spite of an uncooperative U.S. government, mayors around the world are working together to set the agenda on climate change.