Why Super PACs Should Be Banned From Politics

With President Barack Obama recently announcing that he will create a super PAC to help him get reelected and Republican super PACs already raking up the dough and spending it on advertisements, eleven members of the Senate sent a letter to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enact disclosure rules so the public will be informed on who is giving to these organizations. But the real question is: Why aren’t members of Congress enacting legislation to ban super PACs all together?

Super PACs were created after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows corporations to spend as much money as they want on political campaigns. But in fear of scaring away potential customers and a possible public relations flap, corporations have started to donate through different non-profit entities, who then give to the super PAC, which allows the corporation to remain anonymous. The senators who signed the letter asked the FEC to require the non-profits to disclose which corporations donated to them.

A recent report by the Associated Press notes that super PAC’s are already raising more money than the actual presidential candidates who have restrictions on how much individuals can give.  

There is no doubt about the impact these PACs will have in the coming election, but these entities also bring up a bigger problem in how money is affecting American politics. They are spending millions of dollars that will influence voters in November and with 25 percent of all super PAC money coming from just five rich donors, it becomes a select few who have an enormous impact on the results.

These entities do nothing to make sure candidates talk about the issues that affect people’s well being, and instead forces the media to ask the candidates questions based on whatever is being brought up by the super PACs commercials.

While we do know very few of the donors who have given to super PACs and which industries they work for, we still do not know the vast majority of where the money is coming from and how it will impact the candidates when they get elected into office. Since wealthy people will always be able to give more money than those who are not, the disclosure issue is not the main concern. The real problem is how the process is being run.  

If the goal of every politician is to get reelected, why would they even allow the game they play to be dictated by these rules? It is as if they are setting themselves up for what they know is to be a volatile campaign which makes no sense for them to want to fight. If politicians are proud of what they have accomplished in office, let them run on that. If nothing was accomplished, they should have to explain that to their constituents, not the hyperbole that the super PACs bring up to distract voters from the real issues.

Super PACs need to be banned from politics because the money they spend is bad for America’s democracy. In these times where millions of Americans are worried about finding a job, being able to pay the bills, and whether they will ever be able to retire, the last thing any of them need is to hear a debate that is supposed to be about their future construed by lies.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Gregory Rose

Since I could remember I have always been a political junkie. I have interned for several Congressional office including Senator Charles Schumer, Congressman Charles Rangel and Congressman Alan Grayson. After graduating from Muhlenberg College with a BA in Political Science I spent two years in Washington where I received a Masters in Government. I then came back to New York where I worked on local campaigns in the 2010 election cycle and then wrote for an online publication called MediaGlobal. You can find my other writings on my personal website www.roseonpolitics.com

MORE FROM

The 5 major people Donald Trump fired since taking office

Reince Priebus is just the latest high-profile person to be fired by Trump.

How brands battle for creativity and authenticity

In the age of call-out culture and brand boycotts, how can brands get it right the first time?

While You Weren’t Looking: 5 stories free from “skinny repeals” and the Mooch’s “colorful language”

Five stories you may have missed while trying to keep up with a chaotic news week.

In the shadow of Brooklyn’s luxury apartments, “canners” form a tight-knit community

For many lower income people in New York City, canning can be a safe and legal way to earn a living.

A Steve Bannon propagandist is turning the alt-right’s antihero Based Stick Man into a comic book

"We’re never going to change the culture from Washington. We’re going to do it from comics, from movies.”

NBC News chief wanted to dial back MSNBC's liberal identity. Then Trump got elected.

Some insiders say MSNBC is having an identity crisis — but the channel is having its best ratings year ever.

The 5 major people Donald Trump fired since taking office

Reince Priebus is just the latest high-profile person to be fired by Trump.

How brands battle for creativity and authenticity

In the age of call-out culture and brand boycotts, how can brands get it right the first time?

While You Weren’t Looking: 5 stories free from “skinny repeals” and the Mooch’s “colorful language”

Five stories you may have missed while trying to keep up with a chaotic news week.

In the shadow of Brooklyn’s luxury apartments, “canners” form a tight-knit community

For many lower income people in New York City, canning can be a safe and legal way to earn a living.

A Steve Bannon propagandist is turning the alt-right’s antihero Based Stick Man into a comic book

"We’re never going to change the culture from Washington. We’re going to do it from comics, from movies.”

NBC News chief wanted to dial back MSNBC's liberal identity. Then Trump got elected.

Some insiders say MSNBC is having an identity crisis — but the channel is having its best ratings year ever.