Justin Amash vs. the NSA: Does National Security Really Trump Constitutional Rights?

On Thursday, the House will be voting on a new set of restrictions to be placed on the National Security Agency's controversial phone surveillance program, which has caused backlash from members of the intelligence community and the White House.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said he would be "very concerned" were the new limits to be passed. The amendment is to a defense spending bill was written by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Michigan).

Rep. Amash stated, "The people have spoken through their representatives ... This is an opportunity to vote on something that will substantially limit the ability of the NSA to collect their phone records without suspicion."

The bill's amendment removes the "authority for blanket collections under the PATRIOT Act." It also removes the ability of the intelligence community to collect telephone records of those "who are not subject to an investigation."

NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander also said, "What you can see is that everybody wants to ensure we protect civil liberties and privacy and defend this country ... We have that responsibility, and the issue is, how do we do that? How do we take care of our people and protect our civil liberties and privacy? This is a tough issue."

But why does the intelligence community knowingly acknowledge the fact that civil liberties need to be protected, but then move on to state that we need these programs? Is there any way they can accomplish their job without stepping on the Constitution? No, seems to be the answer the intelligence community keeps on giving.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) spoke at the Center for American Progress that the post-9/11 surveillance state could become a permanent reality. Senator Wyden warned, “The combination of increasingly advanced technology with a breakdown in the checks and balances that limit government action could lead us to a surveillance state that cannot be reversed.”

Nevertheless, White House Spokesman Jay Carney voiced the administration’s opposition to the new restrictions in the Amash bill. Carney called Amash’s amendment a “blunt approach” and “not the product of an informed, open or deliberative process.” Again it becomes clear that while the White House publicly supports transparency in government, they have grown too dependent on the NSA’s tactics to let go of them now, whether they are right or wrong. It is understandable clearly that the programs enacted by the NSA provide intelligence of great utility to the U.S. government.

The problem lies in the refusal to acknowledge that there may be a breach in civil liberties through this intelligence gathering. The law needs to be the first point of consideration here. And trying to put down criticisms is harming the debate over these programs.

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

James Gadea

James Gadea is from Atlanta, Georgia. He is a student at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and he is really interested in the relationship between Eastern Europe and the Middle East. James loves history, the smell of Barnes & Noble, and when movie characters say the title of the film that they are in.

MORE FROM

Kshama Sawant on why Seattle needs an independent investigation into the Charleena Lyles shooting

Seattle City Councilperson Kshama Sawant, member of Socialist Alternative party, discusses the Charleena Lyles investigation, tenant voter registration, why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 and more.

The EPA seeks to undo clean water rule, putting 117 million Americans' water at risk

The new rule could have "long-reaching consequences for everyone living in the United States.”

This small Ohio town might stop treating heroin overdoses to save the city money

"People will die. It's plain and simple."

Here's what New York's first official LGBTQ monument will look like

Here's our first look at New York's new monument to LGBT communities.

How will Trump's travel ban be enforced? Here's what the Supreme Court's decision really means.

The Supreme Court's order prevents most of the ban from taking effect before the case is heard, with limited exceptions.

Tick saliva could be the key to fighting a dangerous heart condition

Ticks could hold the secret to treating this heart condition.

Kshama Sawant on why Seattle needs an independent investigation into the Charleena Lyles shooting

Seattle City Councilperson Kshama Sawant, member of Socialist Alternative party, discusses the Charleena Lyles investigation, tenant voter registration, why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016 and more.

The EPA seeks to undo clean water rule, putting 117 million Americans' water at risk

The new rule could have "long-reaching consequences for everyone living in the United States.”

This small Ohio town might stop treating heroin overdoses to save the city money

"People will die. It's plain and simple."

Here's what New York's first official LGBTQ monument will look like

Here's our first look at New York's new monument to LGBT communities.

How will Trump's travel ban be enforced? Here's what the Supreme Court's decision really means.

The Supreme Court's order prevents most of the ban from taking effect before the case is heard, with limited exceptions.

Tick saliva could be the key to fighting a dangerous heart condition

Ticks could hold the secret to treating this heart condition.