Gary Stein Facebook Page Proves the First Amendment is a Dangerous Military Weapon

There are many things wrong with what United States Marine Corps Sergeant Gary Stein has been doing. In case you missed this piece, Sgt. Stein has created a Facebook page where he has posted comments that are critical of the president. But that’s not the problem. Military personnel that are not in uniform are normal people, too, and enjoy the same rights and privileges that all other Americans do, like the right to express their opinions on political matters. However, Sgt. Stein called his page “Armed Forces Tea Party”; a title which, seemingly elevates his opinions, and makes it sound like his beliefs and statements reflect the viewpoint of the U.S. military. (Sergeant Stein also disregarded his Marine traditions. He needs to reread his “Fundamentals of Marine Corps Leadership.” I wonder how he would feel if his privates were to criticize him on social media for the entire world to see?)

Make no mistake – what this sergeant did is wrong. It’s not wrong for any civil rights reasons. Again, he’s allowed to express his opinion, as Marine Corps officials have stated, as long as it’s not in a manner that makes his comments seem representative of the Marines. There’s a good reason for this: something called liberty.

To explain, first, understand that it’s only been a recent trend that we’ve had anything like a large standing army. And, no doubt, as soon as the wars are over, we’ll trim those forces back down. We do this because our forefathers knew that it could be a very bad thing to have a large military on domestic soil. And they knew a politically-motivated military would be even worse. To make this even clearer, it’s very bad to have an ideological force as armed and powerful as the military, lest we have a coup. This is the same reason that Major Nidal Hassan was able to execute a massacre at Fort Hood. None of the other soldiers were armed. We don’t arm our military on our own soil. It’s dangerous for freedom.

And just the same, it’s dangerous and totally inappropriate for Sgt. Stein to post anti-commander-in-chief sentiments, especially when they are politically aligned and he associates them with the military. That’s not to say that the Tea Party is a dangerous party (although, some of you PolicyMicers might disagree). It is to say that a political party of the military is a dangerous thing.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Dario DiBattista

Iraq War veteran Dario DiBattista is the Editor-in-Chief for 20 Something Magazine. His work has appeared in The Washingtonian, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Connecticut Review, and he’s been featured in The New York Times and as a commentator for NPR. His website is www.dariodibattista.com.

MORE FROM

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.