Wiki-PR Lets You Game Wikipedia By Hiring Its Editors

Source: AP
Source: AP

Wikipedia, the net's sixth most populate site online, is probably one of your go-to resources for information — you've probably user it at dinner, over coffee, heck, even the bathroom. But what if I told you those stats you shared with a friend weren't from an out-of-the-woodwork expert editing their field's Wiki? Sue Gardner, executive director of Wikimedia Foundation, announced last Monday that this might be the case. Paid editors have been representing companies and causes on Wikipedia in unprecedented numbers.

Wiki-PR, whose Google header states "Wikipedia Writers for Hire," reports that they represent 12,000 people and corporations on Wikipedia. As a self-labeled research firm, Wiki-PR offers to create a Wiki of your choice for $500-$1000, and maintain the page with the ability to undo unauthorized edits 24/7 for $50 a month. The service seems like a great safeguard from trolling community members, and for protection of your online image, but it's also the co-opting of pages that are meant to democratize the collection and preservation of information.

Jordan French, PR Officer for Wiki-PR justified the company's model in an email to CNET, saying "Our people do a lot of work for free on Wikipedia, just because it's interesting and helpful to the Wikipedia community." And clients of Wiki-PR have noted "I know [Wikipedia has] editors where they read stuff to make sure it's valid."

Okay, maybe ... If the Wiki-PR didn't also employ Wikipedia administrators. Yes, that's right; the people submitting the content and approving it are on the same payroll. In public institutions (Wikipedia might as well be) there's a word for that: corruption.

Sue Gardner realizes what a blow this could be to Wikipedia's image, and the gravity of all the Wikipedia data we consume being a sham, when she notes that "with a half a billion readers, Wikipedia is an important informational resource for people all over the world." Luckily Wikipedia's Terms of Service forbid "attempting to impersonate another user or individual, misrepresenting your affiliation with any individual or entity, or using the username of another user with the intent to deceive." So the paid editors should be easy to ban. It may be a disincentive to the creation of quality content, but at the very least it forces us to just be ourselves, and there's something sort of beautiful about that.

Plus, letting Big Tobacco re-write history would be about the worst thing ever.

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Merrill Cook

Merrill graduated from Sewanee: the University of the South. He quickly escaped the law school bubble. He is an infographic freak and a time-starved traveler.

MORE FROM

Meet the Girl Scouts that will earn badges for being cybersecurity experts

They'll soon get badges for coding, cryptography and more.

How to use the Snapchat Map while everyone else continues to be confused about it

Everything you need to know about the new feature.

Planet 10? Scientists may have discovered a hidden planet in our solar system

There could be a ninth — or even 10th — planet hiding out in our solar system.

Scientists created a robot that will iron your clothes for you

Shut up and take my money.

Moth eyes have inspired the touchscreen of the future

It's going to change the anti-reflection game.

Twitter was flagging tweets including the word "queer" as potentially "offensive content"

Why Twitter put the word "queer" in the same category as violent, sexual imagery.

Meet the Girl Scouts that will earn badges for being cybersecurity experts

They'll soon get badges for coding, cryptography and more.

How to use the Snapchat Map while everyone else continues to be confused about it

Everything you need to know about the new feature.

Planet 10? Scientists may have discovered a hidden planet in our solar system

There could be a ninth — or even 10th — planet hiding out in our solar system.

Scientists created a robot that will iron your clothes for you

Shut up and take my money.

Moth eyes have inspired the touchscreen of the future

It's going to change the anti-reflection game.

Twitter was flagging tweets including the word "queer" as potentially "offensive content"

Why Twitter put the word "queer" in the same category as violent, sexual imagery.