3 Lies About the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, Debunked

3 Lies About the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, Debunked

After 40 years of Americans trying to end workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, the Senate voted on Monday to move forward with the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).

In principle, there is nothing mysterious or complicated about ENDA. In fact, it has a very straightforward goal: to ban employers from discriminating against American workers on the grounds of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Current federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, disability, and gender, so why not extend the same rights to LGBT workers?

However, there's a lot of public debate going on, and there will likely be much heated discussion before (and if) the bill is passed. So what’s the main challenge, really? To overcome tons of misleading information that is popping up everywhere on the web under the guise of "family values," let's consider some important facts:  

1. ENDA Won't Kill Jobs

The Washington Post reported on Monday that House leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) opposes ENDA, which could put the bill's fate in jeopardy. He believes the bill is unnecessary and “will increase frivolous litigation and cost American jobs, especially small business jobs.”  

However, the vast majority of American businesses support the bill and have similar work-related protections to those in ENDA. In fact, 96.6% of Fortune 500 companies have taken steps to prevent discrimination against LGBT workers. If corporate America manages to agree with the need to have non-discrimination policies in the workplace, trust me, it's probably because it won't affect their bottom line. 

To Mr. Boehner: the only thing the bill will kill is your own prejudice, not jobs. 

2. The Majority of Americans Support ENDA

Despite efforts from conservative groups such as Family Research Council Action to shoot down the bill, the vast majority of Americans support ENDA. In the above graph, you can see that majorities in all 50 states support ENDA-like legislation. 

According to a May poll by the Public Religion Research Institute, nearly three-quarters (73%) of Americans  favor protecting gay men and lesbians from workplace discrimination. As this infographic shows, Republicans, independents, Democrats, and even Christian groups, stand behind the bill:  


3. ENDA Does Not Create "Special" Protections for LGBT individuals

The liberal group Right Wing Watch reported this week that radio host Bryan Fischer told his listeners, "We should discriminate against people based on their deviant sexual behavior." According to Fischer's conclusion, ENDA grants special rights to LGBT individuals with "no protection in here for heterosexuals, none whatsoever..." 

What Fischer doesn't know, among other things, is that there is a long history of employment discrimination against LGBT individuals in the United States. A study conducted from the mid-1980s to mid-1990s by The Williams Institute revealed that "16% to 68% of LGBT respondents reported experiencing employment discrimination at some point in their lives." For transgender workers, these numbers are even more revealing, with 78% reporting threats of physical violence and harassment. As this image bellow suggests, most transgendered and gay workers lack comprehensive protection against workplace discrimination: 


Contrary to what Fischer says, ENDA is not about "special" protections. The bill is about job opportunity and fairness for all, including his example of the poor heterosexual white man who suffers from severe discrimination at work (was he talking about himself?). 

Bear in mind: ENDA simply adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of of characteristics that legal practices already protect from discrimination in the workplace, including race, religion, gender and disability. 

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Gil Dantas

Gil was born and raised in Brazil and has a master's degree in economics. She is PolicyMic's Politics columnist covering gender issues, inequality, and tech. Bragging rights? Until this date, she suffers from a heightened sense of curiosity and has travelled the world in pursuit of the perfect cup of coffee.

MORE FROM

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.