Libertarians Led Charge for NY Gay Marriage

The historic victory for individual liberty in New York, as it became the sixth and largest state to legalize same-sex marriage, was only made possible by behind-the-scenes maneuvering between parties. By appealing to the common ground — and more specifically, libertarian instincts — of both Republicans and Democrats in New York, the state legislature was able to create a bipartisan coalition in favor of the expansion of liberty.

Unfortunately, whenever “bipartisan” legislation is passed in the U.S., it is usually the worst of both parties coming together to expand government power and control. The PATRIOT Act, the expansion of foreign wars, and the TARP bailouts are the most obvious examples. But, in the case of same-sex marriage in New York, the exact opposite was true.

As a recent piece for the New York Times points out, it was the invocation of “personal freedom” from Republican donors that got the GOP to rethink their traditional position on gay marriage. According to the article, wealthy Republican donors could afford to insulate senators from conservative backlash and “were inclined to see the issue as one of personal freedom, consistent with their more libertarian views.” These donors “cut six-figure checks to the lobbying campaign that eventually totaled more than $1 million.”

This represents the influence of libertarian ideas not only in the GOP, but also in mainstream American politics. Thanks to the internet, the ease of access to alternative media, and the Ron Paul presidential campaigns, freedom is beginning to have the appeal and audience it deserves.

As we saw in this recent New York measure, when you stop framing issues in terms of Left vs. Right or Republican vs. Democrat, and instead use liberty over government control, more people come on board to build honest coalitions. What is gay marriage about, other than personal freedom? Marriage is fundamentally a private contract between consenting adults. Why should this be any of the government’s business?

Perhaps I am a little biased, but I tend to think that everyone (especially our generation) takes a libertarian stance on at least some issues where they feel that government has no right to intervene and intrude. The problems and conflicts come from the notion of “liberals” and “conservatives” fighting over control of the government to restrict some liberty. This only leads to horizontal quarrelling, and ignores the many issues in which traditional conservatives and honest progressives can agree on (like scaling back the empire, cutting corporate welfare and subsidies, and focusing on domestic concerns). It does not take a Rothbardian libertarian to see that economic and political freedom, decentralization, and “the little platoons” of the market order all go hand-in-hand.

Legalizing same-sex marriage in New York is a victory for freedom and justice in this society. If the methods that achieved this legislative success — appealing to our sense of decency and our instincts for liberty — expand and are duplicated in states and in Washington, then this can only be seen as a welcoming trend in America.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Robert Taylor

Robert Taylor has been writing for PolicyMic since January 2011. He spends his time writing, ranting, reading voraciously, and advocating the virtues of economic and political freedom. He has written for multiple websites and dedicates himself to undermining the state's ability to initiate aggression against peaceful people. He hopes to play a small part in bringing a free, voluntary society into fruition. He also loves billiards, whiskey, and sabermetrics. He blogs at http://roberttaylor.liberty.me/

MORE FROM

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

Sam Brownback: 3 things to know about Trump’s nominee for ambassador-at-large for religious freedom

Brownback was a key sponsor of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which created the job he's now nominated for.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.