The NRA Is Now Fighting Against Elephants

The NRA Is Now Fighting Against Elephants
Source: AP
Source: AP

The National Rifle Association (NRA) recently came out against a White House ban on the commercial sale of ivory, a rule which was designed to protect the world's endangered elephant population. 

The February announcement from The White House was part of a National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking, a larger Obama administration plan designed to address both American conservation concerns as well as security threats posed by the illegal wildlife trade. Specifically, the action would prohibit the import and export of ivory as well as significantly restricting its sale inside the United States, except in the case of “antiques,” which refers to items that are more than 100 years old.

The National Rifle Association's strong opposition only reinforces their absolutist, dogmatic, and draconian views on gun ownership, which reacts to any action taken by Washington regardless of the intention as a historic assault on civil liberties and individual rights.

Unfortunately, their opposition usually comes at another’s expense. In this case the victims are tens of thousands of African and Asian elephants being slaughtered each year for the ivory in their tusks, an issue that has little to nothing to do with American gun rights.


Image credit: AP

The NRA maintains that the ban is another attempt by the President to restrict the rights of gun ownership by limiting the sale of firearms inside the United States. "Any firearm, firearm accessory, or knife that contains ivory, no matter how big or small, would not be able to be soled in the United States, unless it is more than 100 years old," the association said in a statement on their website. “This means if your shotgun has an ivory bead or inlay, your revolver or pistol has ivory grips, your knife has an ivory handle, or if your firearm accessories, such as cleaning tools that contain any ivory, the item would be illegal to sell.”

That is an egregious position given what we know. Aside from the serious conservation concerns, illegal poaching and the ivory trade are increasingly being used to fund radical groups like Joseph Kony's notorious Lord's Renaissance Army, which supports activities including abducting children, forcing them to fight, and selling them into sex slavery. 

The NRA relies on rallying its members by being militantly uncompromising, but this latest call to arms comes across as an embarrassingly petulant and childish overreach. 


A Colt .45 with ivory inlay, which would be legal under the ban, as it was produced in the late 19th century. Image credit: Wikmedia

“This is another attempt by this anti-gun administration to ban firearms based on cosmetics”, the NRA-ILA (the lobbying arm of the NRA) said in February. Although the ivory ban is actually designed to protect elephants from poaching, the association's lobbyists are doing what they do best, pushing conspiracy theories to the lowest common denominator that say any action taken by the President, no matter what the intention, is a virulent attack on their values.

Unfortunately, this latest reaction doesn’t just reveal the NRA’s contempt for the White House and the President but more importantly their callous indifference to anything that stands in the way of promoting their given agenda.

Last year that was 35,000 African elephants. I wonder what it will be next year? We have to overwhelm their opposition with optimism. #ElephantsNotNRA

Tweets about "#ElephantsNotNRA"

How much do you trust the information in this article?

David Ludwig

David graduated from Yale University in 2012 with a degree in Theater. He currently works for BabeWalker.com, contributes to Thoughtcatalog.com, and occasionally models for the Victoria's Secret's plus sized division.

MORE FROM

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.