The One Quote on Iraq That Obama Probably Doesn't Want You to Read

The One Quote on Iraq That Obama Probably Doesn't Want You to Read

President Obama may want to listen to candidate Obama.

As U.S. military jets bombed targets in Iraq on Friday for the first time since the American withdrawal in 2011, Obama argued in an address to the nation that the White House was taking military action to prevent "genocide" (emphasis ours): 

In recent days, Yezidi women, men and children from the area of Sinjar have fled for their lives. And thousands — perhaps tens of thousands — are now hiding high up on the mountain, with little but the clothes on their backs. They're without food, they're without water. People are starving. And children are dying of thirst. Meanwhile, ISIL forces below have called for the systematic destruction of the entire Yezidi people, which would constitute genocide. So these innocent families are faced with a horrible choice: descend the mountain and be slaughtered, or stay and slowly die of thirst and hunger.

I've said before, the United States cannot and should not intervene every time there's a crisis in the world. So let me be clear about why we must act, and act now. When we face a situation like we do on that mountain — with innocent people facing the prospect of violence on a horrific scale, when we have a mandate to help -- in this case, a request from the Iraqi government — and when we have the unique capabilities to help avert a massacre, then I believe the United States of America cannot turn a blind eye. We can act, carefully and responsibly, to prevent a potential act of genocide. That's what we're doing on that mountain.


But almost exactly seven years ago, then-candidate Barack Obama told the Associated Press that, under his administration, genocide would be no justification for continued military action in Iraq: 

Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.

"Well, look, if that's the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now — where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife — which we haven't done," Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press. "We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven’t done. Those of us who care about Darfur don’t think it would be a good idea," he said.


Does this qualify as a "flip-flop?" Not exactly. A lot can happen in seven years, and Iraq is far from the same country. "The U.S. Army is long gone, and taking action there doesn't prolong an ongoing occupation," notes TIME's Michael Crowely. "Nor is Obama ordering anything like a reinvasion of the country. He has authorized — though not yet specifically ordered — only limited strikes against ISIS fighters in the region. 'We are not launching a sustained US campaign against [ISIS] here' a senior Administration official told reporters Thursday night."

Still, the prospect of a military campaign won't sit well with the American public: a June 2014 Gallup poll notes that 61% of Americans approve of Obama's decision to withdraw U.S. forces from the country, and 54% oppose the U.S. taking any military action to combat the Islamic State militants who are sweeping through the country.

Source: Gallup


The president is in a tough spot. Even before the current crises Iraq and the Gaza Strip burst into world stage, conflicts in Ukraine, Syria and elsewhere have tested the limits of a president and country wary of becoming entangled in another foreign conflict. And with the legacy of George W. Bush's campaign in Iraq hanging over his head, Obama should chose his words carefully. 

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Jared Keller

Jared Keller is the former director of news at Mic.

MORE FROM

Warrant suggests Justine Damond may have slapped police cruiser before she was fatally shot

The officers involved in the shooting remain on paid administrative leave.

House passes new sanctions against Russia by an enormous margin

The bill also places limits on Trump’s power to ease or end penalties against Russia.

Paul Manafort is meeting with Senate investigators. Here’s what we know about his Russia ties.

Paul Manafort has Russia links dating back more than 10 years.

Yes, Donald Trump can fire Robert Mueller. Here’s how he can do it.

It's a complicated process, and it could get messy, but he can do it.

Charlie Gard’s parents say they want to take their son home to die

The parents are returning to court to fight for their right to take their son home.

Vatican shuts off historic fountains in the midst of devastating drought

Officials say it's the first time they can recall ever shutting off the Vatican's fountains.

Warrant suggests Justine Damond may have slapped police cruiser before she was fatally shot

The officers involved in the shooting remain on paid administrative leave.

House passes new sanctions against Russia by an enormous margin

The bill also places limits on Trump’s power to ease or end penalties against Russia.

Paul Manafort is meeting with Senate investigators. Here’s what we know about his Russia ties.

Paul Manafort has Russia links dating back more than 10 years.

Yes, Donald Trump can fire Robert Mueller. Here’s how he can do it.

It's a complicated process, and it could get messy, but he can do it.

Charlie Gard’s parents say they want to take their son home to die

The parents are returning to court to fight for their right to take their son home.

Vatican shuts off historic fountains in the midst of devastating drought

Officials say it's the first time they can recall ever shutting off the Vatican's fountains.