Assassinating An American Al-Qaeda Leader

The New York Times is reporting that a recent drone strike in Yemen was aimed at Anwar al-Awlaki, whom they say is a radical American-born cleric that “has recruited English-speaking Islamist militants to Yemen to carry out attacks overseas.” A recent article by Paul Oliver on PolicyMic echoed a similarly unsubstantiated claim that “American-born Al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki has helped plot major terrorism plots from his hideout in Yemen.” Nearly all major media outlets seem ready to name Awlaki as the next bin Laden, and it is thus no wonder that Obama’s recent drone strikes have largely evaded the intense criticisms that would usually accompany the attempted targeted killing of an American citizen. While the attempted assassination of an anti-American Muslim cleric may not seem out of the ordinary given the current geopolitical climate, it is essential that all Americans understand the legal grounds on which the Obama administration may or may not be operating.

The Constitution grants even the most heinous criminals due process of law before being convicted of a crime. In the post-9/11 era, many exceptions to this rule have emerged through legal technicalities, ultimately leading to the current situation at Guantanamo Bay where 48 detainees are deemed “too dangerous to release but not feasible for prosecution because of torture-tainted evidence inadmissible in civilian or military tribunals.”

Assume for argument’s sake that enemy combatants suspected of bringing harm to U.S. troops may legally be imprisoned indefinitely without trial for national security reasons. Given this questionable assumption, could one then argue that the assassination of American citizens by the government for advocating retaliatory violence towards U.S. military targets occupying foreign lands is legal as well? 

As an American citizen, Awlaki’s rights are protected by the Constitution until he violates U.S. laws. However, the CIA has thus far only cited “secret evidence” that Awlaki has played an operational role within Al-Qaeda. It is important to note that merely advocating for violence against U.S. citizens is protected by a Supreme Court ruling so long as one is not advocating for imminent lawless action. In the case of Awlaki, he has thus far advocated for violence only against U.S. military targets, saying that the failed "Christmas Day bombing" by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab “would have been better if the plane was a military one or if it was a US military target.”

In this light, the arguments of Awlaki and figures like Samuel Adams, who openly advocated for violence against British troops some centuries ago, seem to coalesce.

A vital feature of America’s judicial system is the concept that citizens are innocent until proven guilty. U.S. law states that the burden of proof is on the prosecution (in this case, the U.S. government) to prove that terrorists have directly orchestrated attacks on innocent civilians before they can be considered targets for assassination. Are Americans supposed to simply accept that the Obama administration’s attempted assassination of this U.S. citizen in a non-combat zone on May 5, 2011 was based on accurate intelligence that is too sensitive to be made public? Should we then start requiring elementary students to recite the “Blind Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag?”

By all accounts (although establishment lawyers are most likely busy crafting counter-arguments), it is illegal for the government to assassinate a U.S. citizen based on secret evidence without first granting them the right to a trial. Who then is this Awlaki figure to warrant this seemingly blatant violation of the U.S. justice system? For one, he speaks English, and clearly denounced the American public for taking part in "all its government's crimes." 

Nationalist emotions aside, the morality of Alwaki’s views here is irrelevant. What matters is that his right to advocate violence against U.S. citizens and military targets is protected by our legal system so long as he does not advocate for specific, imminent violence. History has shown that societies begin disintegrating when they fail to adhere to their legal systems when it is inconvenient to do so.  Laws should be changed if they need to be, but never broken. Anything less is anarchy.

Thus, the inconvenient truth from this episode is that the attempted assassination of Awlaki should deeply disturb all reasonable people. The targeted assassination of an American citizen without due process based solely on secret evidence would set a sinister precedent; potentially causing citizens to refrain from criticizing the government’s actions for fear of being murdered based on classified information that may or may not be accurate.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

How likely are you to make Mic your go-to news source?

Patrick Morgan

I'm interested in bridging the so-called Keynesian/Austrian divide so that the field of economics can be viewed as a science. I'm obsessed with foreign policy, balance sheet recessions, monetary and fiscal policy, developmental economics, world history, microfinance, SDR's, ranked voting systems, and debating on Reddit. I'm currently working as a stockbroker to pay for my overpriced undergrad degree in finance, and I plan on getting a Master's degree in developmental economics in France in the near future. I have lived and worked in America, France, and China, and I'd love to one day move to North Africa and help establish better relations between the West and the Middle East.

MORE FROM

Minneapolis might get a $15 minimum wage, but restaurant workers aren't celebrating

Discord has been brewing in Minneapolis over whether tipped work will be counted toward a $15 minimum wage.

These abysmal new poll numbers for House health care bill don't bode well for Senate version

Only 34% of Republicans approve of the new proposed law.

'Pizzagate' shooter gets 4-year prison sentence, lawyers urged judge to deter vigilantism

Welch stormed a Washington, D.C., pizza place and shot off a firearm because of the internet.

American Health Care Act by the numbers: What to know about Senate Republicans' secret health plan

After drafting the ACA repeal and replace plan behind closed doors, the AHCA is out — and Senate Republican leaders are hoping to vote on it in a week.

9 photos of Tropical Storm Cindy and its aftermath on the Gulf Coast

National Weather Service forecasters estimate up to 10 inches of rainfall fell in areas between southern Louisiana and the Florida panhandle.

Watch Elizabeth Warren school lawmakers on what Planned Parenthood actually does

"I am sick of coming down to the Senate floor to explain to Republicans what Planned Parenthood does."

Minneapolis might get a $15 minimum wage, but restaurant workers aren't celebrating

Discord has been brewing in Minneapolis over whether tipped work will be counted toward a $15 minimum wage.

These abysmal new poll numbers for House health care bill don't bode well for Senate version

Only 34% of Republicans approve of the new proposed law.

'Pizzagate' shooter gets 4-year prison sentence, lawyers urged judge to deter vigilantism

Welch stormed a Washington, D.C., pizza place and shot off a firearm because of the internet.

American Health Care Act by the numbers: What to know about Senate Republicans' secret health plan

After drafting the ACA repeal and replace plan behind closed doors, the AHCA is out — and Senate Republican leaders are hoping to vote on it in a week.

9 photos of Tropical Storm Cindy and its aftermath on the Gulf Coast

National Weather Service forecasters estimate up to 10 inches of rainfall fell in areas between southern Louisiana and the Florida panhandle.

Watch Elizabeth Warren school lawmakers on what Planned Parenthood actually does

"I am sick of coming down to the Senate floor to explain to Republicans what Planned Parenthood does."