CVS Nail Polish Policy: Are You Fixing Your Manicure or Planning to Cook Meth?

In the past several weeks, CVS pharmacies across New England have implemented new policies that require customers to be over the age of 18 and show ID when purchasing nail polish remover as a means to limit the manufacturing of methamphetamine. While there are federal and state laws that enforce age and purchasing limits for certain cold or allergy medicines (ones that contain the critical pseudoephedrine ingredient), there are no such rules with regard to nail polish remover.

While I commend CVS’s interest in bettering their local communities through curbing the activities of Walter White wannabes, it is doing so ineffectively and with gross overreach by imposing on a majority of people who are doing nothing wrong.

For example, a 2012 study by Cascade Policy Group shows that in Oregon, no decline in meth use was seen as a result of a 2006 policy mandating that cold and allergy medicines could only be purchased with a prescription. This study is incidentally reflective of a national trend that sees an overall decline in meth use and meth lab seizures but not in the availability of the drug itself.

What if CVS decides to go further and enforce a rule requiring an age and purchasing limit on all household items? Would that fix the issue? Ammonia and bleach are common household items used to clean dirty bathtubs and to do laundry, but mixed together in the right fashion they can produce an explosion or a deadly gas. Ammonia and chlorine are common elements in countless of other products, too. Should they be intensely regulated just like cough medicine and nail polish remover because of their pseudoephedrine and acetone contents?

Ultimately, despite these rules that restrict accessibility to typically harmless products, enterprising criminals will always find new ways to create and sell their merchandise. They will always find ways to hack the system and to procure new sources.

While these policies are seemingly well-intentioned, they are attacking the issue from the wrong side of the spectrum. The supply side of methamphetamine through CVS and other similar pharmacies is quite minimal in comparison to the vast other resources drug users have, like the mega labs in Mexico. Not only are innocent people disproportionately affected in cost and encumbrance, tracking them is unethical, too.

Illicit drug activity is undoubtedly an important issue that transcends throughout communities, the nation and the world, but solving it through the punishment of badly manicured 13 year olds and allergy-ridden minors is not the way to go.   

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Alex Uriarte

Alex was raised by a loving Cuban family in Miami, Florida and also lived in Colorado and Canada. She graduated from Florida International University with a Bachelor of Arts in International Relations. While at FIU, Alex engaged in campaign and policy work on both sides of the political aisle while also serving the Miami-Dade community through the Red Cross and the International Rescue Committee. She was also nationally-award winning delegate with the FIU Model United Nations Team. Alex later moved to Washington D.C. to complete a Public Policy fellowship at a boutique lobbying firm and a Federal Relations internship for her alma mater. Alex currently holds post at a brand-new policy and advocacy non-profit, America Achieves. There, she focuses on the development of bipartisan recommendations to Congress that shift use of public dollars to results-driven and innovative solutions. Alex loves to throw-down with friends in the kitchen and find the best eats wherever she goes.

MORE FROM

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Hundreds rally in Times Square to protest Donald Trump’s transgender military ban

“I’m out here to support my trans brothers and sisters who have been serving our military for years and years and years."

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.