Prop 29 and Prop 28: Major Victory for Big Tobacco and Term Limits in California Primary 2012

Leading up to the June primary in California, field polls predicted the lowest voter turnout in state history. With no contentious presidential primary and only a handful of contested races for state office, most of California's registered voters sat this one out. However, the impact in California elections often lies not with races for elected officials, but the latest propositions that have made their way to the ballot. Although there were just two statewide propositions on the ballot this June, Proposition 28 – dealing with term limits – and Proposition 29 – increasing the cigarette tax – both are interesting cases. According to election results, Proposition 28 will pass with 62% of the vote, while the "no" side of Prop 29 holds a very narrow advantage with 50.5% of the vote.

The failing of Prop 29 is significant for one reason: It is a testament to the ever increasing influence of money in deciding elections. When polls were released in March showed voters supported the additional $1 cigarette tax by 63%, the big tobacco machine kicked in. Despite the fact that Prop 29 would raise over $700 million annually – put towards cancer research – and lower the number of California smokers (according to a 2011 study), and that it was supported by the American Cancer Society and American Lung Association as well as touted by Lance Armstrong, attack ads from tobacco companies proved to be more convincing. Two months and millions of dollars later, support for Prop 29 fell dramatically, down to 53% in late May. 

Proposition 28, however, received strong support from voters and will certainly have real and hopefully positive impacts on California government. Prop 28 reduces the total time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years, but it allows 12 years' service in one house. California first began experimenting with term limits in 1990, when voters approved a ballot proposition establishing the current limits of 6 years in the State Assembly and 8 years in the State Senate. Though its intention was to open the field to more Californians and more “citizen legislators,” its real effects have been to create a consistently inexperienced group of legislators who term out of their office as soon as they have finally learned exactly how the California budget works (well, get an idea of it at least). Unintended consequences have included an increasingly powerful class of lobbyists who can more easily influence freshmen lawmakers. Though the new rules under Prop 28 will not solve all of California's problems, the 1990 terms clearly were not working and these new requirements are positive step to trying something new that will change the makeup of state government and maybe even help make it a little more effective.

How much do you trust the information in this article?

Mia Pskowski

A northern California native, currently working as a Community Health Volunteer with the Peace Corps in the South West region of Cameroon. Follow my personal Peace Corps adventures here: miapskow.tumblr.com

MORE FROM

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.

Several Republicans are strongly denouncing Trump’s military transgender ban

“Anybody who wants to serve in the military should serve in the military. I don’t agree with the president.”

Worried Trump might pardon himself? Blame Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton might not have been "thinkin' past tomorrow" when he pushed for broad executive privileges.

Harry Truman desegregated the military 69 years ago. Today, Trump banned transgender troops.

Truman wanted to end discrimination in the military "as rapidly as possible."

Here is a timeline of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeff Sessions

Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Sessions Wednesday — reportedly while the embattled attorney general was in the White House.

How many transgender people serve in the U.S. military?

There's no exact number, but here's what research shows.

Human smuggling is a deadly problem — and hardline immigration policies will make it worse

The recent deaths in a tractor-trailer outside Walmart are startling — but historically, not uncommon.